Senior Journalism Capstone
These are a few of the stories I was able to write during my Senior Journalism Capstone course. It was a service learning course so we worked with an organization that dealt with childhood literacy in the High Point, NC area.
The View From the Classroom
To view with multimedia elements, click here.
Elisa Mattingly
What do
you remember about elementary school?
Most
people would reminisce about recess, being read to by their teacher, field
trips or doing math problems on the board.
What
about standardized tests? Do you remember those?
Those
days were filled with desks set in perfect rows, bright yellow pencils,
Scantron test sheets and headaches.
These
are not the days that people have fond childhood memories about. But, they are
fast becoming one of the most important elements of North Carolina Public
Schools.
With
the End-of-Grade tests for third through eighth grade students, the Writing
Assessments for fourth, eighth and tenth-grade students and the End-of-Course
tests for high school students, standardized testing is rampant in public
schools.
While
tests can be important indicators of a child’s development, many people believe
children are being oversaturated with them.
North
Carolina ranked 39 out of the 50 states in the National Assessment of
Educational Progress for Reading, according to U.S. News & World Report. Many teachers and
parents are beginning to wonder if teaching to the test is really the best
option.
Real Reading Trouble
While
standardized testing continues to be debated in North Carolina, the issue of
child literacy within the state is clear.
According
to Kids Count Data Center, 62 percent of fourth
grade students were not proficient in reading based on standardized test
scores.
It has
been shown that if a child is not literacy proficient by third grade, he/she may never catch up with his/her
classmates.
Michelle
Chapin, Project Manager for Ready for School, Ready for Life, a Guilford County
program focused on improving child literacy, stressed the importance of
on-grade-level reading.
“That
third grade marker can be a predictor for whether you graduate from high
school, end up going to college or end up, perhaps, in jail,” Chapin said.
“It’s remarkable the long-term impact that not reading on grade level by third
grade can have.”
Programs
like Ready for School, Ready for Life pinpoint the issues that North Carolina
students are facing and begin to alleviate those issues before students even
reach kindergarten.
“Starting
backwards is the key, and the earlier that we can have families starting to
think about early literacy, and the way the brain develops, the better chance
their children will have of not needing remediation,” Chapin said.
The
goal is for children to learn the necessary pre-literacy skills, so that there
is no risk of being behind by third grade. They're making sure that students
are prepared before that literacy marker and before the standardized testing
begins.
Expecting Too Much?
While
North Carolina’s child literacy statistics will strike fear and urgency in some
teachers’ hearts, other professionals see the numbers differently.
A professor of Elementary Education, who wishes to remain anonymous, is part of the group that sees it
differently.
“I
think that sometimes we’re asking young children to do too much,” the professor said.
She believes that most children would benefit from a more play-based school
structure that places much less emphasis on testing and more on application.
“We’ve
kind of lost the way on how children need to learn through play,” the professor said. “Children need to learn in ways that are not stressful and not have a lot
of standardized testing.”
While
the concern of child literacy is obviously important to people involved in the
educational system, pressures put on children to reach a certain proficiency at
a certain time can be stressful.
“My
concern has to do more with an assumption that children all have to be at a
certain level at a certain time,” she said.
Unlike
most milestones in a child’s life, there is little wiggle-room for a child to
learn at their own pace when they must reach certain proficiency levels in
school.
“We
don’t expect children to all walk at the exact same month,” the professor said. “A
child needs to learn to walk between 9 months and a year and a half. But we
don’t label them as a concern just because they’re not running across the room
yet at 10 months.”
The
practice of “teaching to the test” does not aid in a child’s natural
development of literacy skills. Teachers must teach in a way that benefit test
scores, not necessarily a child’s natural learning patterns.
“I
think that sometimes with our pushing, believing that kids need to be doing so
much so early, we might be causing bigger concerns,” the professor said. “We’re not
giving them the time and space to play and grow that might be more natural to
their development.”
It is
not, however, a teacher’s fault if he/she must structure curriculum in such a
way that limits learning through play.
“There
is a lot more that can be done through play that schools aren’t allowed to do,
due to constraints that are put upon them,” the professor said. “Sometimes, when
schools get bogged down in requirements and programs, good teachers can have
their hands tied.”
They are not convinced that standardized tests are the most accurate way to assess a
child’s proficiency, development or overall knowledge. Stressing the importance
of the test and putting students through days of back-to-back testing, in order
to see how much they have absorbed, may not be the best indicator of knowledge.
“It’s
interesting what we do to children that we would not allow to occur to
ourselves,” the professor said.
Of
course, some testing is necessary and an important aspect of the education
system.
“I’m
not saying that we shouldn’t be assessing,” the professor said. “Sometimes literacy
is just taken apart into such small pieces that the bigger idea of what reading
and writing is for can get lost.”
Inside the Classroom
Currently,
it is quite common for a North Carolina public school teacher to organize
classes around the information that is likely to be on the end-of-year tests.
This is called “teaching to the test.”
An
anonymous source who works within North Carolina public schools explained that
many teachers, looking for the pay raise good test scores can bring, will
continually stress to students that a certain equation or reading strategy
“will be on the EOG,” meaning the End-of-Grade standardized test.
The
source also stated that they had had heard of teachers changing students’
answers in order to raise their class performance and, hopefully, receive a
raise.
Brenna
Hickey, a third-grade student teacher at Friendship Elementary School,
describes how current teaching techniques can further hinder a student’s love
of learning. She describes how “stations,” a practice where students go to one
location after another, doing new activities at each, is no longer used in many
classrooms.
“At our
school, the teachers are not big fans of doing stations,” Hickey said. “Even
though they help kids and make them excited to learn.”
Hickey’s
third grade students are a diverse group. While many are proficient in the
necessary skills, many are struggling at this pivotal time. Many find
difficulty with reading comprehension.
“They’ll
read something, then I’ll ask them questions after and they’ll say, ‘I don’t
remember,’” Hickey said.
Hickey
is already learning how to teach to the test. She helps the children with
reading strategies that will be helpful to them on the EOGs, such as
underlining key words and finding evidence for answers in the text. These are valuable
skills, but the test is always a factor.
“They
learn something, and they take a test right away,” Hickey said. “Then the EOGs
are mentioned and that just stresses them out.”
As
Hickey begins to think of the classroom she will be teaching in soon, she
remembers her own experience in elementary school, learning things that were
not guaranteed to be on a test.
“There
are so many things that I learned in school that they don’t learn about because
teachers are teaching exactly what they’ll have to know on the EOGs,” Hickey
said. “It’s sad. They’re just being taught how to answer questions.”
Of
course, standardized tests are important indicators of a child’s progress and
growth, but it seems that many classrooms have lost the joy of learning in
exchange for testing.
“I
believe in quizzes and tests,” Hickey said. “You have to have some kind of
formal assessments, but there needs to be a balance.”
Hopefully,
within the debate of testing versus no testing, that balance will be found.
Literacy for All
Elisa Mattingly
To view with multimedia elements, click here.
Bringing literacy to all, that’s what the teams at Reading Connections and Ready for School, Ready for Life are striving to do.
Reading Connections, an organization focused on adult literacy in Guilford County, and Ready for School, Ready for Life, an organization focused on child literacy in Guilford County, have partnered to provide proper resources to families with babies and small children in order to provide them with the right preparation for kindergarten.
According to the 2016-2017 Teaching Strategies GOLD Growth Reports for Guilford County, “60.7 percent of 4-year-olds ready to transition to kindergarten are below widely held expectations for their age” in literacy.
While they have large goals to help benefit childhood literacy in Guilford County, Michelle Chapin, Project Manager for Ready for School, Ready for Life, and Adriana Adams, Family Literacy Manager for Reading Connections, bring different reasons as to why they strive to help.
Reading Struggles
Around 12 percent of Guilford County residents are non-English speakers, according to Data USA. These families often struggle to help their children prepare for school.
Many families feel they are not capable of providing their children with the skills necessary to enter kindergarten. This can be due to their lack of education or because English is their second language.
Adriana Adams explains that parents may be hesitant to interact with their child in their native language as they are afraid that it may stunt their children’s English language growth.
“Some of these parents are afraid that if they speak to their child in Spanish, they’re putting them further back,” Adams said. “So, they put them in front of the TV and say, ‘Maybe they’ll learn some English.’”
The practice of letting the television teach the child is hindering the child in more than just language development.
“They might be picking up on some English [from television], but what they’re not getting is that interaction,” Adams said. “They’re not getting that book read to them. They’re not learning some of those basic things they need to start kindergarten. They’re not going out of the house as much. They’re not getting emotionally prepared for kindergarten.”
This lack of preparation causes teachers to have to rework lesson plans to facilitate the needs of these children because they are not able to begin learning grade-level literacy skills.
“What teachers are having to do is instead of starting with ABCs and 123s, they are having to start even further back,” Adams said. “‘This is a book. This is a pencil. This is how you hold a book.’ These are things that are typically done in the home.”
Reading Connections and Ready for School are providing parents with programs that help them take an active role in their child’s early literacy development. By learning how to speak and read to their children, they are able to provide the interaction necessary for proper cognitive development.
“It’s not just teaching these parents English so that they can talk to their children, it’s saying that their home language is a great place to start,” Adams said. “It's telling them, 'Don’t remove yourself.'”
By providing parents the tools to help their children, Michelle Chapin explains, they gain confidence in the fact that they are able to help their children, not hinder them.
“They build their confidence because they’re getting this curriculum from the program,” Chapin said. “They can know, based on science, that they can actually help their child’s growth and development.”
Contrasting Cultures and Policy Walls
While providing families with the at-home curriculum they need to aid in their child’s development can be difficult, there are several other factors that make Reading Connections and Ready for School’s job a challenge.
Because many of these families are immigrants, it is a risk each day for them to leave their homes. Something as simple as going to an after-school program may put their safety in question.
“There’s been a lot of fear,” Adams said. “We do an after-school program for the family literacy program. That means that the family has to come out of their home again. Some of them walk, but some of them have to get in a car and drive. That’s a really scary experience for someone who has questionable immigrant status.”
The anti-immigrant policies, a hallmark of Trump’s presidency, has made things even trickier for non-native residents.
“It’s been challenging this past year,” Adams said. “We’re making sure families feel safe when they come and making sure that they have their basic needs met, so that they can focus on their learning.”
Another challenge is the cultural differences present in many of the households. Some families do not recognize how important interaction with an infant can be for their cognitive development.
“There are cultures, and even just parents [who were raised differently], that don’t recognize that pre-literacy skills really do start right after birth because of the way the brain develops,” Chapin said.
It can also be difficult for families to make time in their busy schedules to come to a literacy program or to allow for the necessary amount of time to aid in their child’s literacy development.
“One of the challenges is family engagement,” Chapin said. “Families are busy. They don’t necessarily think that what we have to offer is what they need. We need to be conscientious of that. We need to listen and learn them from them in terms of what their needs are.”
It takes time for families to realize how important this work can be. It takes even more time to build up trust between the organizations and the families they help.
“They feel you are someone they can trust and can talk with,” Chapin said. “That relationship building takes time.”
Reading Rewards
Although there are frequent challenges, both organizations find that the final product of their work is what makes all of the struggles worth it.
Seeing families take an active role in their child’s learning, when they were so hesitant to do so before the program, is an exciting moment for both the family and the organization.
“The most rewarding part is seeing families succeed,” Adams said. “Seeing a grandmother and a mother come to our program and sit together and read a book together for the first time to their child, it’s just a really beautiful thing to be a part of.”
Building trust with a family, especially one that has had a difficult time over the past year is also one of the best parts of being involved with these organizations.
“There’s been a lot of struggle this past year in the immigrant community," Adams said. “There have been a lot of people that I work with that have been negatively affected by some new policies. So, helping a family get through that, and being brought in as a part of that process, is very rewarding. It's rewarding to know that they trust us enough to do that.”
Beyond the help that the organization can give, it is also important that these families build relationships with each other in order to build necessary support systems.
“The program brought together two High Point families that didn’t know each other even though they were actually neighbors,” Chapin said. “If programs aren’t there to bring families together to build that social network, then that social network may never happen.”
These social networks can mean someone to help implement the program’s curriculum into a home or someone to lean on during tough times.
“That’s the difference between families who can pull themselves out of those difficult times and those who can’t,” Chapin said. “It’s those social networks and the social capital that is built when you lean on each other. To have another neighbor be able to give you a ride when your car breaks down or to watch your kids when you have to run to work, those little relationships, can really make a big difference in someone’s life. We’re making those connections happen and they’re continuing to stay close and be that support for each other.”
The confidence, support and social networks that families are cultivating through these programs are necessary tools. The most important aspect of the program, however, is how they are helping to provide the resources to aid in children’s cognitive development and cultivation of literacy skills.
“It is all about the future of our community,” Chapin said. “The infants of today will someday be adults. We want them all to be healthy and have productive lives, whatever that is for them.”
For more information on Reading Connections, go to readingconnections.org. For more information about Ready for School, Ready for Life, go to getreadyguilford.org.
Comments
Post a Comment